``

Rita Levi-Montalcini

Born: April 22, 1909, Turin, Italy

Died: December 30, 2012, Rome, Italy

Overview

Rita Levi-Montalcini was a distinguished Italian neurobiologist who was awarded the 1986 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine jointly with Stanley Cohen for the discovery of nerve growth factor (NGF). This discovery revolutionized the study of cell growth and differentiation and opened up new avenues for understanding and treating neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.

Early Life and Education

Born in Turin to a Jewish family, Levi-Montalcini faced discrimination in pursuing her scientific aspirations under Mussolini's fascist regime. Undeterred, she set up a makeshift laboratory in her bedroom and continued her research even amidst the turmoil of World War II. After the war, she accepted a research position at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, where she made her groundbreaking discovery of NGF.

Scientific Career and NGF

Levi-Montalcini's work on NGF began in the 1950s. Through meticulous experimentation, she demonstrated the existence and crucial role of this protein in the development and survival of nerve cells. NGF is now recognized as a key regulator of neuronal growth, differentiation, and survival throughout life.

Later Years and Legacy

Levi-Montalcini remained scientifically active even into her advanced years. She returned to Italy and served in the Italian Senate as a life senator. She was a strong advocate for science and education, especially for women, and inspired generations of scientists with her relentless pursuit of knowledge and her unwavering dedication to her work. Her legacy extends beyond her scientific discoveries to her indomitable spirit and her tireless advocacy for scientific progress.

Further Information

Unfortunately, details about specific social media accounts and recent projects associated with Rita Levi-Montalcini during her lifetime are not readily accessible. As a historical figure who passed away in 2012, her online presence would likely have been different from contemporary figures. For more in-depth information, biographical resources and scientific publications would be valuable sources.

```